2002 #16 Swenson 7-15-02
RE: DWAIN AND LIND SWENSON, Bankr. No. 02-40154, Chapter 7
The matter before the Court is the United States Trustee's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [re:
United States Trustee's Motion to Dismiss for Substantial Abuse] and Debtors' response. This is a core
proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). This letter decision and accompanying Order shall constitute the
Court's findings and conclusions under Fed.Rs.Bankr.P. 7052 and 9014. As set forth below, the Motion will
be granted and Debtors' case will be converted to Chapter 13.
Summary of facts. Dwain and Linda Swenson ("Debtors") filed a Chapter 7 petition and schedules in
mid-February 2002. Based on their Schedules I and J, Debtors had disposable income of at least $560.78.
The United States Trustee filed a motion to dismiss the Chapter 7 case under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) because
this amount of disposable income would be sufficient to fund a Chapter 13 plan. In the Motion, based on
Debtors' testimony at their § 341 meeting of creditors, the United States Trustee also identified an additional
$160 that could be used to fund a Chapter 13 plan. In their response to the Motion to Dismiss, Debtors set
forth four expenses that they had either forgotten or understated on their Schedule J. They also stated that
Debtor Linda Swenson's work hours had been reduced and that their monthly income was thus reduced by
$151.72. Debtors further argued that a Chapter 13 plan was not feasible because Debtor Linda Swenson's
employment situation was unstable and that both Debtors, due to their age, would have difficulty finding
new employment if either would loose their job.
The United States Trustee moved for a judgment on the pleadings based on his recalculation of Debtors'
disposable income, which was based on Debtors' response to the Motion to Dismiss and some discovery
documents regarding Debtor Linda Swenson's pay. The United States Trustee calculated that Debtors'
actually had monthly income of $2,540 and expenses (not including repayment of unsecured, pre-petition
debt) of $2,105.25. This left Debtors with monthly disposable income of $434.75, which, the United States
Trustee argued, would fund a Chapter 13 plan. In their response, Debtors again argued the uncertainty of
Debtor Linda Swenson's employment and the difficulty she would face in finding a new job.
Applicable law. Section 707(b) of the Bankruptcy Code permits the dismissal of a Chapter 7 case upon a
showing that granting the debtor relief would be a substantial abuse of the Bankruptcy Code. The section is
intended to promote fairness to creditors and prevent the use of Chapter 7 by non needy debtors. Stuart v.
Koch (In re Koch), 109 F.3d 1285, 1288 (8th Cir. 1997).
"Substantial abuse" is not defined within the Bankruptcy Code. In interpreting the section, the Court of
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has held that the primary inquiry is whether the debtor has the ability to pay
creditors under a Chapter 13 plan. Id. (citing In re Walton, 866 F.2d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1989)); Nelson v.
Siouxland Federal Credit Union (In re Nelson), 223 B.R. 349, 353 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 1998). A debtor's ability
to pay is measured by evaluating the debtor's financial condition in a hypothetical Chapter 13 case. Id. The
analysis includes the expectation that the debtor will put forth his best effort in a Chapter 13 plan. In re
Shelley, 231 B.R. 317, 319 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1999); In re Pamela E. Beauchamp, Bankr. No. 97-50487, slip
op. at 6 (Bankr. D.S.D. May 28, 1998) (citing Hagel v. Drummond (In re Hagel), 184 B.R. 793, 798 (B.A.P.
9th Cir. 1995)).
Discussion. Debtors' disposable income of $434.75 will allow them to fund a Chapter 13 plan that will
provide a meaningful repayment of pre-petition debt. Over a three-year plan, Debtors can repay about 60%
of the pre-petition unsecured claims plus the case trustee's commission. Over a five-year plan, they can pay
virtually all this debt. Accordingly, the United States Trustee's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will
be granted.
In their latest response, Debtors asked that they be allowed to convert their case to Chapter 13, rather than
having it dismissed. The Court will, therefore, enter an order converting this case to Chapter 13.
If Debtors face employment troubles during the term of their Chapter 13 plan, they may file a motion to
modify their plan payments, as needed. See11 U.S.C. § 1329 and Local Bankruptcy Rule 3015-4.