Bankr. No.:
84-30017
Chapter:
12
Date of Decision:
December 31, 1991
Issue:
Whether creditor had established by a preponderance of evidence that her unsecured claims were entitled to administrative expense priority under 11 U.S.C. ยงยง 503(b)(1) and 507 )\(a)(1)?
Ruling:
Ruling: No. Creditor failed to present sufficient evidence to support her claims. "Sparse, self-serving, and cursory evidence is insufficient" to show that the expense arose post-petition and that it benefited the DIP in the operation of its business.
Full Bankruptcy Court Decision:
