You are here

In re Dale Arthur Resel

Bankr. No.: 
86-30077
Chapter: 
11
Date of Decision: 
May 16, 1988
Issue: 
(1) Enforcement of a stipulation, or in the alternative, for the award of administrative expense status. (2) Administrative expense claim - are all parties in interest entitled to notice?
Ruling: 
(1) Rule 9019 - Notice for approval issue - In re Bramham, 38 B.R. 459, 465 (Bkrtcy. D. Nev. 1984) (citing In re Lloyd, Carr & Co., 617 F2d 882 (1st Cir. 1980)); In re Bell and Beckwith, 50 B.R. 422 (Bkrtcy. N.D. Ohio 1985)(citing In re Flight Transp. Corp. Securities Litigation, 730 F2d 1128 (8th Cir 1984)). Notice not property given - Court cannot enforce the terms of the memorandum appended to the motion. (2) In re Dakota Industries, Inc., 31 B.R. 23 (Bkrtcy D.S.D. 1983); 1 Norton, Bankruptcy Law& Practice, Section 12.04 (1981) - all parties in interest should have been given notice of an administrative expense request.
Full Bankruptcy Court Decision: