(1) Debtor had not proposed his plan in good faith because he had not shown that his large IRAs are exempt, the plan did not recognize that the IRAs and a monthly annuity payment may constitute disposable income, his schedule I was incomplete, and he and his non-debtor wife's business transactions were apparently designed to minimize his assets to forestall a judgment creditor's collection efforts. (2) Debtor was given a deadline to file a modified plan and get it confirmed or the case will be dismissed.